While most Christians assume their religion started with Jesus Christ, and never question who created the Christian religion, it is quite clear that it was neither Jesus, the Jews, nor was it the Essene. In fact the only group present at that time that figured to profit from a new religion were the Romans. So, why were the Romans interested in creating a new religion? From the events of the Pisonian Conspiracy we gather evidence that the empire was besieged by unrest often caused by religious strife. It was also a time when the Imperial Cult of Rome was in decline, and the Romans sought a new religion that paralleled that of Judaism which was the fastest growing religion at that time. However, Jews were opposed to slavery an institution that created great wealth for the empire. So, starting with Apollonius, Damis, Josephus, and the emperors Vespasian, and his son Titus they created a secret pact, called 'The Sons of the Sun', to create a new religion. This new religion would act as a form of mind control to put an end to the religious bickering throughout the empire.
According to my count there are thirty references, or allusions to the Old Testament found in Mark. This is troubling since the gospels are supposedly the revelations of Jesus Christ the Son of God, and not just a rehash of the Old Testament. There are even more to be found in Matthew, Luke, and John. Furthermore, the Gospel of Mark was supposedly written c 70 CE, or during the reign of the Emperor Vespasian, but we find: ". . . with all my endeavors to get possession of the old books of the Jews, I did not succeed in getting one; for the Jews destroyed them rather than that they should be desecrated by heathens."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Vespasian. How could the date of authorship of Mark be true if the Roman Emperor Vespasian, 69 CE -- 79 CE, was unable to acquire any of the Jewish writings? One thing about the gospels that has become abundantly clear is that none of the authors were the names attributed to them, and none of the authors actually knew or ever heard Jesus. We can easily garner this from the writings of Justin Martyr where he freely quotes from these texts, but does not include any of the attributions later assigned to them by Irenaeus.
Christians marvel at how even on the cross Jesus quotes the Old Testament: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?"--Psalm 22:1. "And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?" which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"--Mark 15:34. Of course the more obvious answer is that this is mere copying.
For some inexplicable reason we believe these stories to be true even though in the epistles of Paul we find: "Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all."--Galatians 4:24-26. Since Paul seems all too aware that the Old Testament stories were allegorical would he not have followed suit, and written his scriptures as allegory.
There are four differing gospel stories, the common narrative is; Jesus was born in a manger in Bethlehem, was visited by the three wise men, at birth, who somehow came from the east while following a star in the east, fled to Egypt, and returned to Nazareth, started his ministry after being baptized by John, and was crucified c 30 CE. Since there was an unforeseen problem arising out of Mark where it states "Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon?" Huh! The Jews were a patriarchal society, so why not mention Jesus as the son of Joseph. As a result of this both Matthew, and Luke had to fashion a birth narrative to appease critics of the fledgling religion. The problem is that neither Matthew, nor Luke concocted the same story. Jesus was only be born in Bethlehem, in Luke, because of a census which occurred in 6 CE. The Matthew gospel, where the birth takes place 10 years earlier, gives no reason why Mary was in Bethlehem since they were supposedly from Nazareth which is about 95 miles to the north. He then is preaching in a temple in Jerusalem at the age of twelve. This would take us to the year 18 CE. There are then eighteen missing years, which are also missing in Josephus, which would take us to the year 36 CE. However, we are told that Jesus was baptized by John just prior to John's execution which occurred as a result of his admonishing Herod Antipas for his affair with his brother's wife Herodias. This supposedly occurred c 29 CE, and according to the synoptic gospels Jesus preached for one year before being crucified, but this would be 37 CE, and not 30 CE, and according to John he preached for three years which would take us to 39 CE. By then Tiberius was dead, 37 CE, and Caiaphas, and Pilate were long gone from Jerusalem, and Herod Antipas was exiled to Gaul by Caligula. If we were to go with the Matthew gospel then the crucifixion would have taken place during the 20s. As you can see neither of these scenarios work.
These gospels are clearly not historical, but are pure allegory. Jesus is born in a manger which is a cave or vault which is the fornix of the brain. He then descends, like all of us, to earth. He then follows the Greek system of enlightenment. He is baptized by John, the water god, which represents the second level or water. He climbs a mountain where he is transfigured where the mountain represents air. He is then crucified dies and descends into hell which represents fire or the final step of enlightenment. He is entombed in a vault which is once again the fornix of the brain.
"Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."--2Corinthians 3:6.
"And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?:"Luke 6:46. Yes, listen to Jesus and go to church. Wait, Jesus did not found a church. During the life of Jesus there was no church only the Jewish synagogue of which he was not a big fan. So, he could not have been telling you to go to church. "Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls."Matthew 11:29. Yoke can be interpreted as a burden or compliance with a regimen such as yoga which is Sanskrit for yoke.
If you take the scriptures literally then why haven't you taken up your cross? "And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me."--Luke 9:23. Could it be that this is just allegory?
"Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:"--Mark 4:11.
"But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him."1 John 2:27. "But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ."--Galatians 1:11, 12. According to Christian Bible teachers this is understood to mean that Paul was somehow psychically connected to a disembodied Jesus, but according to 1 John it was the physiological anointing by the chrism or christ oil that was responsible for his teachings. Dead or alive Jesus of Nazareth is still a man.
The ancients believed that the claustrum secreted the oil or chrism down into the body, and that very same oil is what greased the spinal column allowing the kundalini to rise up to the skull. Of course there is no anatomical evidence that this is true. "And he poured of the anointing oil upon Aaron's head, and anointed him, to sanctify him".--Leviticus 8:12. The anointing oil of scripture is the claustrum which is a thin, bilateral structure which connects to cortical (ex. pre-frontal cortex) and subcortical regions (ex. thalamus) of the brain. It is difficult to access and is believed to function as a conductor for inputs from the cortical regions so these respective areas do not become unsynchronized. The chrism comes from the claustrum, and another word for chrism is Christ. Anointing does not mean pouring oil over someone's head.
The Corruption of Christianity
For almost two thousand years Christians suppressed the existence of the Essene. They portrayed Jesus and his followers as normal Pharisaic Jews who had a bone to pick with the establishment. Thus, they ignore the fact that the meditating Essene and temple worshippping Pharisee were arch enemies dating back to 65 BCE when Aristobulus II, 66 BCE - 63 BCE, had the Essene Teacher of Righteousness executed. This sent the Essene community into a deep depression which led to the rumor that God would send not one, but two messiahs. The first, a warrior king, and the second a priestly sacrificial lamb. The twins described in the Safed scroll were viewed as the fulfillment of this prophesy. In the Dead Sea scrolls we find: "From [his] Youth they shall instruct him in the Book of Meditation and shall teach him, according to his age, the precepts of the Covenant."--Dead Sea scrolls (IQSa 1, 6-9).
What you read in your scriptures today are not original. According to Christian scholar Bart Ehrman 78% of what you find in today's New Testament did not exist in the original texts. Eusebius (Eccleastical History), citing the second century Church Father Clement of Alexandria: "The worst corruptions to which the New Testament has ever been subjected originated within one hundred years after it was composed." "...theological disputes, specifically disputes over Christology, prompted Christian scribes to alter the words of scripture in order to make them more serviceable for the polemical task. Scribes modified their manuscripts to make them more patently 'orthodox' and less susceptible to 'abuse' by the opponents of orthodoxy"--Professor Bart D. Ehrman, 'The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture'.
"Have you not read this Scripture: "The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: This was the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?"--Mark 12:10, 11, "Haven't you read this passage of Scripture: "'The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; the Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes'"--Mark 12:10, 11, (NIV). Matthew 21:42, Luke 20:17, Acts 4:11, 1Peter 2:7. This verse coming immediately after Jesus' parable of the vineyard is troubling since it uses the pronoun our eyes instead of my eyes, even though its' placement is intended to give the impression that Jesus is still speaking. Yet, it is obviously not Jesus speaking. Who are the our? My guess is Roman Catholic priests, and who are the builders? This could only refer to the Ebionites, and the Nazoreans who were the original followers of Jesus many of whom actually knew him. The preceding text is based on Jeremiah: "Many pastors have destroyed my vineyard, they have trodden my portion under foot, they have made my pleasant portion a desolate wilderness."--Jeremiah 12:10. "For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard."--Matthew 20:1. These verses are referring to the 90% of the brain which is God's portion, which you are ignoring, and being denied entrance to you by your pastor. You can normally judge the importance of a Bible verse by the number of scriptures that quote it. Here you have five various scriptures that mention it. So, it must be important. Yet, I guess you will almost never hear your preacher use these scriptures in their sermons.
According to the Safed scroll: Yeshai (Jesus) ben Halachmee's outspoken religious views angered the Jewish priests. He was tried by a Roman court on a charge of inciting the people to rebel against Rome, found guilty and sentenced to death, but escaped and traveled to India. The gospels also have Jesus upsetting the Jewish priests which led to his crucifixion. Why would the Jewish priests be so upset by Jesus if he supported the religious views of the temple worshipping Pharisee?
In the Tathbit we find: "The Christians (used to) complain to the Romans about the Jews, showed them their own weakness and appealed to their pity. ...And the Romans said to the Christians: "Between us and the Jews there is a pact which (obliges us) not to change their religious laws (adyan). But if you would abandon their laws and separate yourselves from them, praying as we do (while facing) the East, eating (the things) we eat, and regarding as permissible that which we consider as such, we should help you and make you powerful, and the Jews would find no way (to harm you). On the contrary, you would be more powerful than they." "And teach customs, which are not lawful for us to receive, neither to observe, being Romans."--Acts 16:21
"The Christians answered: 'We will do this.' (And the Romans) said: 'Go, fetch your companions, and bring your Book (kitab).' (The Christians) went to their companions, informed them of (what had taken place) between them and the Romans and said to them: 'Bring the Gospel (al-injil), and stand up so that we should go to them.' But these (companions) said to them: 'You have done ill. We are not permitted (to let) the Romans pollute the Gospel.'" The addition of the builders and the cornerstone found in Mark and many other scriptures seems to be nothing more or less than Roman pollution. They didn't understand or want to know about enlightened beings or a real God since to them the Emperor of Rome was god. Perhaps this is why over 250,000 Jews were crucified, or executed by the Romans during the first century.
These cornerstone verses are the crux, or cornerstone of the entire Christian Bible. The importance is that the authors are endowing themselves with an authority which they previously lacked. Nowhere do they tell you who the builders were, or what is the cornerstone. It is clear from both of these verses that somehow they are talking about something that happened in the past, since both rejected, and refused are in the past tense. Even though it is commonly understood that Christianity basically begins with the Mark Gospel, but wait the author gives every impression that it is Jesus speaking since it follows a parable by Jesus, and never indicates that the speaker has changed. How can Jesus be talking about the builders, or founders? Aren't the gospels supposed to represent the revelations of Jesus Christ who never wrote anything himself, or started a religion. So, these passages can only be referring to the Old Testament. "The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner. This is the LORD's doing; it is marvellous in our eyes."--Psalm 118:22, 23. This flies in the face of reason for the whole Jesus movement, and what Jesus was actually saying; "And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition."--Mark 7:9. "But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?"--Matthew 15:3. If you are not aware of the reason for the antagonism between Jesus and the Jewish priests, it is the difference between the temple worshipping Pharisee, and the meditating Essene.
For this reason it seems obvious that these verses were written at a later date, and inserted into the scriptures. Then they have the audacity to claim that this was the Lord's doing. How? These people are truly the self anointed. "All the Epistles and Gospels are, in reality, the creation of the Christian priests"--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled' testimony of Eusebius of Caesarea. "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."--Matthew 16:18.
The New Testament was copied from the Greek. In Greek the word used in English Peter, meaning the Rock, on which Christ was to build His church are two separate and distinct words, each having a different meaning. Peter in Greek is either: petros, which means "a piece of rock; a single stone, movable, insecure, shifting, or rolling," or petra, which means "a rock; a cliff; a projecting rock; mother rock; huge mass; solid formation; fixed; immovable; enduring." The use of petros for Peter in Greek is in the masculine gender and the word petra for the rock is in the feminine gender.
The article in Greek is important. If the noun is masculine it must have a masculine article, and if it is feminine it must have a feminine article. The text under consideration in the Greek shows that Peter is masculine, hence the correct word should be petros which is masculine, but the text treats it as if it is petra which is feminine. On which of these did Jesus build his Church. I think the answer is simple.
"And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple."--Matthew 24:1. "And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down."--Matthew 24:2. When Jesus is not in your temple then you will turn toward religion. "We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands."--Mark 14:58.
"For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens."--2Corinthians 5:1.
Forget all the Christian malarkey about the crucifixion of Peter, and Christian persecution under the Emperor Nero. This is all made up Christian nonsense. Peter, or shall I say Simon was crucified c 47 CE by Tiberius Alexander. "And besides this, the sons of Judas of Galilee were now slain; I mean of that Judas who caused the people to revolt, when Cyrenius came to take an account of the estates of the Jews, as we have showed in a foregoing book. The names of those sons were James and Simon, whom Alexander commanded to be crucified."--Josephus, "Antiquities," XX:5:2. You can find the same story in Acts with Peter being substituted for Simon, but set during the reign of Agrippa. "And when we came to Rome,...Paul called the chief of the Jews together...And they said unto him, We neither received letters out of Judaea concerning thee, neither any of the brethren that came shewed or spake any harm of thee. But we desire to hear of thee what thou thinkest: for as concerning this sect, we know that every where it is spoken against."--Acts 28:16,21,22 KJV. This event happened c 60-61 CE. Why doesn't Paul seek out Peter, who was supposedly the first archbishop of Rome, or any other members of the Christian community? Could it be that he didn't seek out Peter because he knew that Peter was dead, and he didn't seek out members of the Christian community because there wasn't a Christian community at that time living in Rome?
"Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:"--Matthew 25:34.
"Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?"--Corinthians 3:16. "For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;"--Acts 17:23, 24.
"Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you."--Luke 17:21. "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13. "Woe unto you, scribes (Bible teachers) and Pharisees (temple worshippers), hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."--Matthew 23:15
"And when they were come unto a place called Golgotha, that is to say, a place of a skull"--Matthew 27:33. "And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him,"--Luke 23:33. Calvary comes from the Latin Calvaria meaning skull. This is where Jesus was crucified and not at some as yet undiscovered hill outside of Jerusalem. The name Galilee means circuit as in the circuit of the brain. "if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light."Matthew 6:19-22.
"Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?"--Matthew 6:31. "Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?"--Matthew 6:25. "The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light."--Matthew 6:22.
For over fifteen hundred years Christians have read the gospels believing that they were written about a crucified savior who died to atone for the sins of man. What they don't realize is that this was not the intention of the original authors. After the original authors were long dead the Church in its infinite wisdom decided to make the crucified savior the symbol of their religion. This happened about 680 C.E., prior to that the symbol of the religion was of the lamb of God.
"Apollonius made two journeys to India, and not one as is generally supposed. The last of these was about from A. D. 40 to 50. It was, when on that journey, that he reached Farther India, whence he brought back the Indian gospels in relation to the Hindoo god Christos."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Damis. The gospels cover the seasons of life from the birth narrative, to the baptism, the transfiguration, the crucifixion, the renunciation, the resurrection and the ascension. Much like the four step path of the Greeks, or Buddha's eight step path to enlightenment, the gospels reveal a seven step path to enlightenment. While the fraudsters found the cornerstone verse in the Book of Psalms they seemed to have overlooked the Book of Isaiah: "I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no savior"--Isaiah 43:11.
"This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all."--1John 1:5. "Jesus said, "If they say to you, 'Where did you come from?', say to them, 'We came from the light, the place where the light came into being on its own accord and established itself and became manifest through their image."--Thomas (50). According to Numbers 23:19, God is not a man. According to Jesus: "You are the light of the world."--Matthew 5:14. Hence: "Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?"John 10:34, and since light is photon, you are also photon.
According to the Toldoth Yeshu, it was Yeshu (Jesus) who entered the holy place and copied the name of God, but according to the testimony of Jewish high priest Ananias it was actually Apollonius or Apollos (Paul) who violated the Holy of the Holiest, not Jesus. As a result of this violation he, Apollonius (Paul) was arrested by the procurator Felix. This incident is well documented and occurred 58 CE or well after the crucifixion. Both Paul and Apollonius were arrested by Felix, and later freed by Festus.
"I was one of the accusers of Apollonius before Felix. The name ought to have been Apollos, instead of Paul. The charge that was there set down against him was, that he was a seditious and pestilent fellow. That was not the charge made against him at all. The charge was that he had attempted to enter the Holy of Holies, claiming the divine right to do so. When the priests and populace attempted to restrain him, and keep him from entering there, such was his power that he entered the Holy of Holies, and none present could stop him. We called this power, the power of God, but yon people call it mediumship."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Ananais, Jewish High Priest. From reading this you would assume that Apollos or Paul had entered the Jewish Temple, that is of course until you come to the part where it says you people call this power mediumship. This could only mean that he had entered the holiest place via meditation. "And after five days Ananias the high priest descended with the elders, and with a certain orator named Tertullus, who informed the governor against Paul."--Acts 24:1
What these verses are actually saying is that the founders of both Judaism and Christianity REJECTED the stone which God created and created a stone of their own making. Jeremiah talks about the vineyard which God created. "Many pastors have destroyed my vineyard, they have trodden my portion under foot, they have made my pleasant portion a desolate wilderness."--Jeremiah 12:10. "For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard."--Matthew 20:1. Don't rely on the labor of others to tend your vineyard, but rather take the time to tend to it on your own.
The Pauline Epistles Do Not Agree with the Gospels
The teachings in the gospels are drastically different from what is written in the epistles of Paul. So, they predated events of the gospels to give Jesus priority over Paul. According to the Apostle Paul there is no good, and evil, but rather two distinct ways in which we can experience reality: the first is through the carnal mind, and the second is through the spiritual mind. "For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God."--Romans 6-8. Carnal means fleshy and temporal or earthly. Carnal behaviors are those that are motivated by the lust of the eyes, lust of the flesh, and pride of life. --For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God."--Hebrews 7:19. It is you who are able to draw closer to God not the church.
"And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law, that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham:"--Hebrews 7:5. Why are you giving tithes to priests who came out of the womb just like you? They know nothing, and can offer you nothing.
"And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God."--Romans 12:2. "And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;"--Ephesians 4:23. These epistles were written during the fifties, and early sixties, and while Paul mentions the crucifixion of Christ he doesn't seem to know anything about it, there is no empty tomb narrative, there is no resurrection, and more importantly there is no Jesus of Nazareth. What Paul is talking about is the renewing of your mind not a physical real world resurrection of the flesh. Remember, these epistles were written some twenty years after the alleged crucifixion, and about twenty years before the earliest gospel.
"My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,"--Galatians 4:19. "I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me:"--Galatians 2:20. "Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular."--1Corinthians 12:27. "At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you."--John 14:20. "Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption."--1Corinthians 15:50. "So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:"--1Corinthians 15:42
Depicted above are two stones: the one on the left is an obelisk from St. Peters, in Rome, which represents the stone created by man. On the right is the pineal gland, a calcification linked to the thalamus, or the stone created by God, This is the stone that God created, and the builders or creators of Christianity rejected. It is located in the fornix the place where the white horse or hippocampus resides. This is the manger where Jesus was born as well as the vault where Jesus was laid to rest.
Depicted on the left is the temple created by God, and not built by human hands. On the right is the temple, or church created by man.
"The greatest difficulty that I found at Antioch was when we undertook to make Hesus Christos a Jew."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', the testimony of Severus, 5th century Patriarch of Antioch. "...all men knew the story of Jesus Christ was nothing but the old story of Christos or Chrishna of India revived."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Caius Valerius Maximianus Galerius, Roman Emperor, 305-311 CE "...I captured the writings of Zoroaster, and Diocletian submitted them to a comparison with the writings of the Christians. The Christian writings were declared to be fraudulent."--Ibid. The gospels were derived from the Indian writings, and the epistles from Zoroaster. "...the Jews were the lowest heathens of my time on earth. They worshipped everything they felt like worshipping." --Antiquity Unveiled, Testimony of Vespasian. "The Jews were at that time engaged in all kinds of spiritual forgeries"--Antiquity Unveiled, Testimony of Procurator Felix.
"All the Gospels and Epistles of Apollonius of Tyana were in what might be termed the Hebraic, or Samaritan tongue, and the Greek writers translated them,...to suit themselves. ."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Eusebius of Caesarea.. "All the Epistles and Gospels are. in reality, the creation of the Christian priests"--Ibid. "The original Jesus Christ was a Hindoo god, known under the name Christos, or Krishna"--Ibid. "I knew of the writings of Marcion--not that he was the author of them--but he substituted a myth for a reality."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Clement Alexandrinus. Clement established a fraternity of monks, but did not reveal his source. "...so I used the name of Apollonius, which after my time was erased and the name of Jesus Christ substituted by Eusebius of Caesarea. All his translations of my writings are, in the main forgeries."--Ibid.
If you haven't figured it out yet, there were two distinctly different people referred to as Jesus Christ. The first is the real live flesh, and blood Jesus found in many of the apocryphal texts. These were Yeshai and Judas ben Halachmee who were the illegitimate twin sons born of a fifteen-year-old girl called Stadea. Her name in the Talmud is Stada. They were taken in, raised and educated by the religious order of Essenes. They were arrested, but escaped to India. Neither one of them was crucified. The second is the fake Jesus, known as Jesus Christ created by the Church based more on the life of the Hindu god, Krishna, and other earlier resurrected savior gods like the Egyptian god Osiris which can be found in the canonical gospels.
It is from the first Jesus that we learn about his family. his mother was Mary that is the one thing the stories have in common. Jesus had four brothers, these were James, Simon, Jose and Thomas. Thomas would be his twin Judas. His brothers James, and Simon align perfectly with the sons of Judas of Galilee. When it comes to Joseph the stories diverge. In the gospels Mary is supposedly betrothed to Joseph, but from the Safed scroll we find that Joseph was just the boys Essene caretaker.
"In the year 325 A.D. was perpetrated one of the most colossal frauds and deceptions in the annals of history. This was the date of the Council of Nicea, whose task it was to create a new religion that would be acceptable to Emperor Constantine..."The Historical Apollonius Versus the Mythical Jesus By: Dr. R. W. Bernard, Ph.D.
"Historians Philo, Milman, Tytler and Kersey Graves, record that the Essenes doctrine closely paralleled the Buddhist school of Pythagoras in Alexandria, Egypt."Stefan Vucak, 'Jesus the Nazarene myth'.
According to Bishop Irenaeus: "Each of the four principal sects of heretics, he says, makes use in their Churches of one or the other of these four gospels, for instance: Matthew by the Ebionites; Mark by 'those who separate Jesus from Christ'; Luke by the Marcionites; and John by the Valentinians; and this heretical use of the Four, argues the Bishop, confirms their like acceptance and use by the True Churches."--(Reinach, Orpheus, p. 217.) In other words the Orthodox Church which claims to be the true Church of Jesus Christ borrowed, or should I say stole their scriptures from the very people they called heretics.
This fact is attested to by Eusebius: "Those ancient Therapeuts (Essenes) were Christians, and their ancient writings were our gospels."--Eusebius, 'History of the Church.'
There never was a Saul of Tarsus
"Lucian and Marcion were the St. Luke and St. Mark of the Christian Scriptures."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Lucius of Cyrene. "We find this fellow to be a public nuisance. He stirs up civil strife among all the Jews, all over the world. He is a ringleader in the sect of the Nazoreans."--Acts 24:5. (NTE). This is where the scriptures run awry. You see you also have: "For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes,"--Acts 24:5 (KJV). Whoever wrote these verses had no idea what they were writing. While Nazorean referred to an Essene Jewish sect that Jesus was a member of, the term Nazarene referred to a sect founded by the Apostle Paul, and indeed both of these quotes actually refer to Paul and not Jesus. "And after five days Ananias the high priest descended with the elders, and with a certain orator named Tertullus, who informed the governor against Paul."--Acts 24:1 (KJV).
"Apollonius made two journeys to India, and not one as is generally supposed. The last of these was about from A. D. 40 to 50. It was, when on that journey, that he reached Farther India, whence he brought back the Indian gospels in relation to the Hindoo god Christos."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', Testimony of Damis. "The most important part of the life of Apollonius extended over the reigns of Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva and into the reign of Trajan. I passed to spirit about 90 A. D. I wrote memoirs of Apollonius from about 34 A. D. to 80 A. D. The Greek followers of Promitheus mutilated those memoirs. They were greatly opposed to the introduction of the Indian Christos among the Greeks, and were exceedingly opposed to Apollonius and his teachings. . . . Apollonius was the real Paul,. . . "--Ibid.
The epistles of Paul were written by Apollonius: "These epistles were written or copied from the originals by Apollonius, Apollos, or Paulus; and in order to disguise the identity of their author, Apollonius of Tyana, I interpolated that description of Paul that was afterward copied by Lucian."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled', testimony of Marcion.
According to the Ebionites: "They declare that he (Paul) was a Greek ... He went up to Jerusalem, they say, and when he had spent some time there, he was seized with a passion to marry the daughter of the priest. For this reason he became a proselyte and was circumcised. Then, when he failed to get the girl, he flew into a rage and wrote against circumcision and against the sabbath and the Law"--(Epiphanius, Panarion, 30.16.6-9)
"She ran away from the priests, fell in love with a man, and they took hold of each other's hands. Hold of each other's hands they took, went forth and settled at the mouth of Frash. (Euphrates)"--Ancient Scroll of Miryai.
"We will slay them and make Miryai scorned in Jerusalem. A stake (Cross) will we set up for the man who has ruined Miryai and led her away. There shall be no day in the world when a stranger enters Jerusalem."--Sidra d'Yahya, Book of John the Baptist. From all the information we could find this person hung from the cross was Paul or Apollonius not Jesus Christ. According to the Safed scroll Jesus and his twin Thomas were both captured by the Romans, but escaped and made their way to India (Acts of Thomas). Writing a scroll in those days was no easy task, and it is clear that these documents are historical, and have no religious significance like the gospels.
"And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus."--Galatians 4:14. Could this explain why it is so difficult to discern whether the offender was Jesus, or Paul? "I conclude that I am both the Jesus and St. Paul of the Christian scriptures."--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled' testimony of Apollonius.
It is all too likely that the gospels, in particular those of Mark and Matthew, were written by Apollonius of Tyana, and Josephus. If you wonder why both Josephus and Apollonius became ardent supporters of Rome you must realize that after the fall of Jotapata, Josephus was taken prisoner by Vespasian, he presented himself as a prophet. Noting that the war had been propelled by an ancient oracle that foretold a world ruler would arise from Judaea, Josephus asserted that this referred to Vespasian, who was destined to become Emperor of Rome. Intrigued, Vespasian spared his life, but Apollonius, a known medium, who himself almost faced crucifixion by Nero claims that it was he who convinced Vespasian to spare the life of Josephus. Now, we know that Josephus became the historian of the Romans concerning the Jews so would it be far fetched to believe that he also authored propaganda for the Empire. After all Jesus had been dead for forty years and no one had taken pen in hand to author a gospel, but one year after Josephus' life was spared we get the Gospel of Mark. Remember, that Josepus' 'War of the Jews', and the gospels of Mark and Matthew were written at around the same time, and it would have been very unlikely that someone else would have had the information and motivation to have written these gospels.
"Josephus, Apollonius and myself, were all initiated in the secret order called the "Sons of Sun." The Emperors Claudius, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva, and Trajan, Were all initiated in that order...therefore made a binding rule upon the members, that they should manifest no outward relation to one another,"--J. M. Roberts, 'Antiquity Unveiled' testimony of Damis
When Dr. James Tabor, Dr. Robert Eisenman, and Dr. Michael O. Wise first began studying the Dead Sea Scrolls they were surprised to find that the Essene residents of Qumran were not the gentle pious monkish order they thought, but rather a much more militant group intent on gaining revenge on the Pharisee, and driving the Romans out of Palestine. These were the Messianic Jews who's biggest gripe was that they could not worship the Roman Emperor, who was just a man, as god. However, we find that the Christians did just that with their god Jesus Christ.
The Dead Sea Scroll writings date from the third century BCE up until the middle of the first century CE. While the scrolls clearly demonstrate a belief that these people were awaiting the arrival of a Jewish Messiah it is clear that no such person ever appeared. It is likely that their hopes, and dreams were dashed when they were vanquished by the Roman legions. However, this brings us back to the "Tathbit Dala'il Nubuwwat Sayyidina Muhammad" which claims that certain members of the community traded parts of their book or scriptures in return for preferential treatment by the Romans.
The Gospel of John Attests to the Fact that Jesus Christ Did NOT Exist
The Gospel of Matthew devotes the entire first chapter establishing that Jesus is a 'Son of Davi' making him eligible to be the Jewish messiah. Then in chapter four they argue that Jesus is the 'Son of God'. Which is it? A man cannot have two fathers. "And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread."--Matthew 4:3. From then on Jesus becomes the 'Son of God' . According to Jewish law a man must be a 'Son of David' not the 'Son of God' in order to be the Jewish messiah. Jesus is supposed to be God's only son, but not according to the Old Testament. "That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose."--Genesis 6:2. These fallen angels became the fathers of the Nephilim, or giants, according to the apocryphal 'Book of Enoch'. These fallen angels were probably extraterrestrials not angels. Hence this could make Jesus the offspring of an extraterrestrial.
"And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face"Genesis 32:30. This seems to be an outright contradiction of what the Gospel of John says.
The Gospel of John does not seem to agree with Jacob, but offers the following:
A. "No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him."--John 1:18.
B. "I and the Father are one"--John 10:30.
C."Whoever has seen me has seen the Father", --John 14:9. If A is true then B and C cannot possibly be true, and if B and C are true then A cannot possibly be true.
How is this even possible? There is only one way that both of these statements can be true. If no one has seen God, and since Jesus is one with the father then no one has seen Jesus, but Jesus says, if you have seen me you have seen the father. Therefore the only possibility is that no one has seen either the father, or the son. If no one has ever seen God, and Jesus is one with God then how is it possible that anyone witnessed the events in the gospel stories if no one has ever seen Jesus. Therefore, the gospel accounts are not literal accounts of the life and crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the invisible God, but just allegory. Furthermore, which god are they talking about? "And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:"Genesis 3:22. "Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?"--John 10:34. "I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High."--Psalm 82:6. "Shew the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods:"Isaiah 41:23. If ye are gods then there is NO God.
This brings us back to the beginning where it says: Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."--John 14:6. All of these verses come from the Gospel of John. Some even come from the same chapter. How can any of this be true if Jesus is just as invisible as God.
Continued Table of Contents